Supreme Court Rejects NSA Phone Surveillance Challenge
What's This?

The U.S. Supreme Court turned away a challenge to the Obama administration's spying practices, leaving intact an order that required Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) to turn over records of its customers' domestic phone calls.
The justices today said they won’t hear arguments from the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which argued that a national-security court exceeded its authority by ordering Verizon to provide the call data.
The case represented the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to review the surveillance program since former government contractor Edward Snowden began releasing information about the extent of data and communications swept up by the National Security Agency.
EPIC, as the Washington-based privacy group is known, faced a high hurdle in its bid for Supreme Court review because it took the unusual step of filing its complaint directly with the high court. In urging the justices not to intervene, the Obama administration pointed to similar suits that have been filed at federal trial courts.
EPIC, a Verizon customer, challenged an April 2013 order issued by a judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The order centered on “metadata” — call logs showing phone numbers, time and duration.
The case is In Re Electronic Privacy Information Center, 13-58.
Image: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images
- Boeing 777X Borrows Dreamliner Wing While Dodging 787’s Stumbles
- Why Is Hong Kong Punishing the Philippines Now?
- Silicon Valley Nerds Seek Revenge on NSA Spies With Coding
- Cities Raise Alarms Over EPA’s Surprise Hydrant Lead Rule
This article originally published at Bloomberg here
Topics: edward snowden, NSA, Politics, Supreme Court, U.S., US & World
0 comments: